Plugin bloat, taxonomy sprawl, duplicate archives, builder-generated markup, and the Core Web Vitals damage that themes quietly cause.
WordPress gives you everything and governs nothing. Two SEO plugins fighting over canonical tags, tag archives generating thousands of thin URLs, a page builder emitting div soup with no heading hierarchy, and a theme loading six font files before the hero paints. We audit the whole stack and prescribe the smallest set of changes that recovers rankings without a rebuild.
Two SEO plugins is not twice the SEO. It's a canonical tag argument your rankings lose.
— Arise GEO, WordPress SEO Audit
A page builder that ships forty nested divs and one H1 is invisible to the systems that extract answers.
— Arise GEO, WordPress SEO Audit
Every SEO-adjacent plugin reviewed for overlap, duplicate output, and performance cost — with a consolidation plan.
Tag, category, author, date, and attachment archives audited for index eligibility and consolidated where they add nothing.
Heading hierarchy, semantic landmarks, image handling, and schema injection reviewed at the template level.
Product, Offer, AggregateRating and Review schema, variation URL handling, and category page depth for commercial intent.
We can promise this because our methodology already works. Hundreds of pages now sit in position #1 across our clients' catalogs. The risk shouldn't be on you — it's on us.
Whichever one you already have, configured correctly, running alone. Yoast, Rank Math, and SEOPress can all do the job. Running two is the actual problem.
Either. We hand off a developer-ready execution doc, or our team implements on a staging environment and ships via pull request.
Usually. Most WordPress CWV failures come from render-blocking plugin assets, unoptimized images, and font loading — all fixable inside the existing theme.
Yes. Multisite adds cross-site duplication and canonical policy work, which we scope per network.
Implement our 90-day plan and if you don't see results in 3–6 months, we refund you in full.
Three layers, in order. First, entity clarity: one canonical Organization with @id anchors, sameAs links to authoritative databases, and knowsAbout coverage of your real expertise. Second, extractable content: atomic answer blocks, comparison tables, transparent pricing and specs, and FAQ blocks on every commercial page. Third, corroboration: mentions in the roundups, directories, review platforms, and trade publications those engines retrieve. Measure it by probing a fixed set of buying questions monthly and tracking citation frequency per engine.
Citability. AI engines lift passages that answer one question completely in 40–80 words, in plain language, with a concrete number, definition, or list. Pages that bury the answer under narrative rarely get quoted. We rewrite key pages so every important question has a self-contained answer block, wrapped in schema that labels what it is.
Yes, because AI answers are built from indexed pages. Every major assistant retrieves from a crawled index, so pages that aren't crawlable, renderable, or structured never enter the candidate pool. Classic SEO is now the entry requirement for AI visibility, and the two programs share almost all of the same work.
Technical recovery and on-page work typically show movement in 30–60 days. AI citation lift on long-tail and comparison queries usually lands in 30–90 days. Category-level authority and head-term rankings are a 6–12 month curve. Every engagement ships a sequenced 90-day plan so early wins fund the long work.
You get a forensic audit, a prioritized 90-day execution plan with effort and impact scoring, and optional done-for-you implementation by our engineers and editors. Pricing is scoped per engagement based on catalog size, locale count, and whether you want execution included. Implement our 90-day plan and if you don't see results in 3–6 months, we refund you in full.
Audits scoped within 24 hours. Results within 90 days, or your money back.
Request Your Audit →