Connected TV inventory is tightening and CPMs on platforms like MNTN and Vibe keep drifting upward. We rebuild targeting, creative, and measurement so television spend stays accountable to revenue.
Performance CTV had a cheap window and that window is closing. As more direct-response budget moves into streaming, the same premium inventory pools get bid up, effective CPMs rise, and the frequency you buy per dollar falls. Advertisers who set up in the cheap era are now paying more for the same reach, measuring with a view-through window that flatters the channel, and wondering why blended ROAS is sliding. We fix the three things that actually move CTV economics: what you buy, what you show, and how you measure it.
A 30-day view-through window will make almost any TV campaign look profitable. That is a reporting choice, not a result.
— Arise GEO, CTV Advertising
When inventory tightens, the advertiser with the better creative pays less for the same attention.
— Arise GEO, CTV Advertising
We audit where your impressions actually land, prune low-quality and duplicative inventory, and rebalance audience pools so rising CPMs do not simply buy you more frequency against the same households.
Most underperforming CTV accounts have a repurposed brand film and nothing else. We build a testing slate with clear product framing, an on-screen offer, and variants matched to audience temperature.
We shorten attribution windows, add geo holdouts, and reconcile platform-reported results against site and CRM data so budget decisions rest on incremental revenue.
For service and considered-purchase businesses we pair CTV reach with landing pages, call tracking, and lead scoring so the channel is judged on qualified pipeline.
We can promise this because our methodology already works. Hundreds of pages now sit in position #1 across our clients' catalogs. The risk shouldn't be on you — it's on us.
More direct-response budget is competing for a supply pool that grows more slowly than demand, and premium streaming inventory is the first to tighten. The practical effect is fewer impressions per dollar, so uncapped frequency and loose audience pools now cost far more than they used to.
In order of impact: cap frequency and prune low-quality placements, ship a real performance creative slate rather than a repurposed brand film, shorten the view-through window so reporting reflects reality, and rebalance spend toward prospecting audiences that actually add incremental reach.
Yes, but not through last-click. The reliable read is a geo holdout: run the campaign in matched markets, hold it out in others, and compare total revenue or qualified leads. Platform-reported view-through conversions are directional at best.
Not automatically. Measure incremental contribution profit first. Plenty of accounts we review are not suffering from expensive inventory, they are suffering from uncapped frequency and weak creative that make expensive inventory unaffordable.
It does for considered purchases and local service businesses, provided you build the downstream measurement: dedicated landing pages, call tracking, lead scoring, and a CRM closed loop. Without those, CTV lead-gen reporting is guesswork.
Three layers, in order. First, entity clarity: one canonical Organization with @id anchors, sameAs links to authoritative databases, and knowsAbout coverage of your real expertise. Second, extractable content: atomic answer blocks, comparison tables, transparent pricing and specs, and FAQ blocks on every commercial page. Third, corroboration: mentions in the roundups, directories, review platforms, and trade publications those engines retrieve. Measure it by probing a fixed set of buying questions monthly and tracking citation frequency per engine.
Citability. AI engines lift passages that answer one question completely in 40–80 words, in plain language, with a concrete number, definition, or list. Pages that bury the answer under narrative rarely get quoted. We rewrite key pages so every important question has a self-contained answer block, wrapped in schema that labels what it is.
Yes, because AI answers are built from indexed pages. Every major assistant retrieves from a crawled index, so pages that aren't crawlable, renderable, or structured never enter the candidate pool. Classic SEO is now the entry requirement for AI visibility, and the two programs share almost all of the same work.
Technical recovery and on-page work typically show movement in 30–60 days. AI citation lift on long-tail and comparison queries usually lands in 30–90 days. Category-level authority and head-term rankings are a 6–12 month curve. Every engagement ships a sequenced 90-day plan so early wins fund the long work.
You get a forensic audit, a prioritized 90-day execution plan with effort and impact scoring, and optional done-for-you implementation by our engineers and editors. Pricing is scoped per engagement based on catalog size, locale count, and whether you want execution included. Implement our 90-day plan and if you don't see results in 3–6 months, we refund you in full.
Audits scoped within 24 hours. Results within 90 days, or your money back.
Request Your Audit →