JSON-LD vs Microdata
Both formats encode the same schema.org vocabulary. The difference is where the markup lives, how easy it is to maintain, and how reliably engines extract it.
JSON-LD
Modern stacks, headless commerce, JS-rendered apps, and AI-citation-eligible content.
Microdata
Legacy server-rendered sites where markup-in-HTML is already in place.
Want to know where JSON-LD and Microdata both say you're invisible?
We'll run your domain through both stacks plus live AI-search checks (ChatGPT, Perplexity, AI Overviews) and send back a 3-point snapshot within 24 hours. Free, no pitch deck.
Head-to-head
| Criterion | JSON-LD | Microdata |
|---|---|---|
| Google's stated preference | ✓Recommended | Supported |
| Maintainability | ✓Decoupled from HTML | Inline with HTML — fragile |
| Render reliability (JS sites) | ✓High — injectable in <head> | Low — DOM-dependent |
| AI engine extraction | ✓Reliable | Hit-or-miss |
| Editorial / CMS friendliness | ✓High | Low |
| Validation tooling | ✓Excellent (Schema Markup Validator, Rich Results Test) | Good |
Use JSON-LD. Google explicitly prefers it, AI engines parse it more reliably, and it decouples markup from presentation HTML. Microdata is acceptable on legacy stacks you cannot refactor — but new builds should ship JSON-LD without exception.
Frequently asked
Should I migrate Microdata to JSON-LD?+
Yes — on any site you actively maintain. The migration is low-risk (you can ship both temporarily), and the maintainability + AI-extraction win is large.
Can I use both at the same time?+
Yes, briefly during a migration. Long-term, run one format to avoid drift between the two declarations.
Does JSON-LD work on JavaScript-rendered pages?+
Yes — but inject the script tag in the initial server response (or via SSR/static), not after hydration. Late-injected JSON-LD is unreliable for both Google and AI engines.
// Related comparisons
Not sure which fits your store? Get a free 3-point GEO snapshot in 24h.