// Guide_02

    How to choose an ecommerce SEO agency.

    The criteria that actually predict whether an agency will move revenue, plus where we fit and where a different type of shop is the better call.

    Agency shortlists are usually built from case studies, which are the least reliable signal available. These five criteria are testable in a single call, and they predict outcomes far better than a logo wall. We've included where we're the wrong choice too.

    // Key_Takeaways

    • Ask what percentage of retainer hours become shipped changes — the answer separates agencies fast.
    • Platform depth beats general SEO ability for ecommerce; catalogue mechanics are where the money is.
    • An agency that can't attribute organic to revenue will always report on rankings instead.

    Case studies are marketing. Ask instead what happened to the client that churned.

    — Arise GEO, Ecommerce SEO Agencies

    The right question isn't 'what would you do for us' — it's 'who on your team does it, and how often do they ship'.

    — Arise GEO, Ecommerce SEO Agencies
    5
    Testable criteria
    $4,500
    Our audit fee
    180-day
    Our guarantee
    20
    Competitor comparisons
    // Criterion 1

    Platform and catalogue depth

    Ecommerce SEO lives in facets, variants, discontinued SKUs and collection architecture. Ask for the agency's default policy on each — vague answers mean no policy.

    • Facet indexation policy
    • Discontinued SKU handling
    • Variant canonical approach
    • Seasonal page lifecycle
    // Criterion 2

    Engineering handoff

    Findings become value only when merged. Ask to see a real ticket they wrote, with acceptance criteria.

    • Sample ticket, not sample audit
    • Acceptance criteria present
    • Effort estimates included
    • Post-merge verification process
    // Criterion 3

    Revenue attribution and AI coverage

    Reporting should tie organic to revenue, and any agency working in 2026 should have a defensible answer on AI citation measurement.

    • Revenue-attributed reporting
    • Assisted conversion modelling
    • AI citation measurement method
    • Probe set stability
    // Fit

    Where we fit — and where we don't

    We fit $1M–$100M ecommerce with technical debt and implementation capacity. We're wrong for pre-PMF startups, pure link-building briefs, and teams that want reporting without change.

    • Good fit: technical debt + dev capacity
    • Good fit: AI visibility is a priority
    • Poor fit: pre-PMF or sub-30-page sites
    • Poor fit: link-buying mandates
    // The_Contract

    The 180-day money-back guarantee.

    We can promise this because our methodology already works. Hundreds of pages now sit in position #1 across our clients' catalogs. The risk shouldn't be on you — it's on us.

    • 01We run the full 10-stage audit and deliver a sequenced 90-day plan.
    • 02You implement our recommendations (or hire us to implement them).
    • 03If you don't see measurable ranking and revenue improvement in 3–6 months — we refund you. In full.
    Lock in your audit slot →
    // Frequently_Asked

    Questions about this engagement.

    Should we hire a specialist or a full-service agency?+

    Specialists win when the problem is diagnosable and technical. Full-service wins when you need one throat to choke across channels and can accept less depth.

    How much should we budget?+

    Meaningful ecommerce programs generally start around $6,500 a month, with a one-off audit in the $4,000–$15,000 range depending on scope.

    How long before we judge them?+

    Three months for leading indicators, six for revenue. Anyone promising revenue in thirty days is selling brand-term harvesting.

    Where can I compare you directly to others?+

    Our comparison hub covers twenty named alternatives with honest fit notes for each.

    Put us on your shortlist.

    Audits scoped within 24 hours. Results within 90 days, or your money back.

    Request Your Audit →