// AI_Search_Fixes_05

    Audit and fix your structured data.

    Rich results are inconsistent, validators report errors, and you are not confident the markup describes your business accurately. Markup was added page by page over years, so entities are duplicated, @id anchors are missing, and half the templates emit schema that contradicts the other half.

    This page is for sites with years of accumulated, inconsistent schema markup. Rich results are inconsistent, validators report errors, and you are not confident the markup describes your business accurately. Markup was added page by page over years, so entities are duplicated, @id anchors are missing, and half the templates emit schema that contradicts the other half. The work below is the sequence we run when a client brings us this exact problem: diagnose against evidence rather than assumption, fix the underlying cause rather than the symptom, and measure the result on template-level validation pass rate and duplicate-entity count.

    // Key_Takeaways

    • Rich results are inconsistent, validators report errors, and you are not confident the markup describes your business accurately.
    • Markup was added page by page over years, so entities are duplicated, @id anchors are missing, and half the templates emit schema that contradicts the other half.
    • What changes: one coherent machine-readable identity across the site, with markup that validates cleanly and describes what the pages actually contain.
    • How we prove it: template-level validation pass rate and duplicate-entity count.

    Markup was added page by page over years, so entities are duplicated, @id anchors are missing, and half the templates emit schema that contradicts the other half.

    — Arise GEO, Audit and fix your structured data

    One coherent machine-readable identity across the site, with markup that validates cleanly and describes what the pages actually contain.

    — Arise GEO, Audit and fix your structured data
    24 hours
    Scoped response
    $4,500
    Forensic audit
    90 days
    Execution plan
    180-day
    Money-back window
    // Symptom

    What this looks like from the inside

    Rich results are inconsistent, validators report errors, and you are not confident the markup describes your business accurately. It is usually noticed late, because the reporting most teams have was built for a search landscape where the click was the only outcome worth counting. Markup was added page by page over years, so entities are duplicated, @id anchors are missing, and half the templates emit schema that contradicts the other half.

    • Evidence gathered before any recommendation
    • Cause separated from symptom
    • Scope agreed in writing before work starts
    • No engagement recommended if the data does not support one
    // Method

    How we actually fix it

    Four steps, run in order. Each one produces an artefact you keep, whether or not you continue with us.

    • Crawl every template and extract the emitted JSON-LD
    • Map duplicate and conflicting entities across the site
    • Rebuild a single anchored graph with stable @id references and sameAs links
    • Validate at template level and monitor for regressions
    // Outcome

    What changes when it works

    One coherent machine-readable identity across the site, with markup that validates cleanly and describes what the pages actually contain. We report against template-level validation pass rate and duplicate-entity count. — set as a baseline before anything ships, so the effect of the work is separable from seasonality and from everything else running in parallel.

    • Baseline captured before work begins
    • Matched before-and-after measurement windows
    • Reporting by segment, not in aggregate
    • Findings documented whether positive or not
    // Start here

    The cheapest way to find out

    Run the free AI visibility check first. It takes a minute, needs no signup beyond an email, and tells you whether this is genuinely your problem before anyone talks about a fee. If it is, the forensic audit is $4,500 and covers the full diagnosis with a 90-day execution plan.

    • Free visibility check, instant results
    • $4,500 forensic audit with 90-day plan
    • 24-hour scoped response on enquiries
    • 180-day money-back window on retainers
    // The_Contract

    The 180-day money-back guarantee.

    We can promise this because our methodology already works. Hundreds of pages now sit in position #1 across our clients' catalogs. The risk shouldn't be on you — it's on us.

    • 01We run the full 10-stage audit and deliver a sequenced 90-day plan.
    • 02You implement our recommendations (or hire us to implement them).
    • 03If you don't see measurable ranking and revenue improvement in 3–6 months — we refund you. In full.
    Lock in your audit slot →
    // Frequently_Asked

    Questions about this engagement.

    How do I know if my schema markup is actually correct?+

    Markup was added page by page over years, so entities are duplicated, @id anchors are missing, and half the templates emit schema that contradicts the other half. The practical answer is to diagnose before acting: crawl every template and extract the emitted JSON-LD, then map duplicate and conflicting entities across the site. One coherent machine-readable identity across the site, with markup that validates cleanly and describes what the pages actually contain.

    How long does this take to show results?+

    Long-tail and comparison questions typically move within 30–90 days of the fix shipping. Broad category questions take longer because they depend on corroboration accumulating outside your own site, which you influence but do not control.

    What does it cost?+

    The forensic audit is $4,500 and includes the full diagnosis plus a prioritised 90-day plan you can execute yourself. Ongoing engagements are scoped per brand. Implement our plan and if you do not see movement in 3–6 months, we refund our fees in full.

    Can we do this in-house?+

    Often, yes — and the audit is deliberately written so you can. Most teams have the capability but lack the diagnostic layer and the measurement, which is what makes the work land on the right pages in the right order.

    How do you measure success here?+

    Template-level validation pass rate and duplicate-entity count. Baselines are captured before anything ships and reported by segment, so improvement is attributable rather than assumed.

    Is this different from regular SEO?+

    It shares the technical groundwork but changes the target. Classic SEO competes for a position in a list of links; this competes to be the source a model uses and names, which rewards explicit data, honest qualifiers, named expertise and independent corroboration.

    Audit and fix your structured data — start with the free check.

    Audits scoped within 24 hours. Results within 90 days, or your money back.

    Request Your Audit →